Themes: Finance
Pub Date : 2009
Countries : US
Industry : Not Applicable
After the BrettonWoods breakdown, the informal system that prevailed evolved out of a set of
decisions of the individual countries such asUS, Japan, SaudiArabia and later byChina.This informal
system is sustained by differing but complementary national policies of the key and emerging
economies. The US accepted the adverse effects of trade deficits on its employment situation in
exchange for its trade deficits being funded by emerging economies. And the emerging economies
accepted a lower standard of living in exchange for its export-led growth. For decades, without
incurring the need to depreciate its own currency, the US has been running enormous trade deficits with the easy recourse to massive budget deficits.
On the other side of the coin, Japan kept its yen intentionally
undervalued compared to dollar to perpetuate its trade surplus and dollar
accumulation to carry on its export-led growth.
US did not retaliate since Japan did not use the dollars in exchange for the yen but recycled them back in the US by purchasing US treasury bills and other dollar-denominated assets amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars. Japan’s strategy, followed by China and others, has kept on swelling the foreign holdings of the US treasury securities, which stood at $2,846.4 billion as on September 30th 2008. The major buyers of the US treasury securities such as China, Japan, UK, Oil Exporters and Brazil held around $1,800 billion.
The US was thus freed from the necessity of keeping yield rates on treasury securities high to
attract the treasury bill buyers. The yield rate on a 30-year treasury bond, for example, ruled at a
measly 4.2%6 .As a result, the US could afford to bring down the Federal Reserve rate, for instance,
from 6% at the outset of the year 2001 to a mere 1% in 2003 after a succession of 11 cuts.7 The
successive interest rate cuts enabled by net foreign purchase of the US securities (Exhibit IV) made
mortgage loans attractive, fuelled demand for houses and led to increases in their prices resulting in
the housing boom.
The US-originated financial crisis (2008) has been ascribed to the ultra easy credit often with
zero down payment in the early 1990s, topped with Clinton administration’s pressure in the late
1990s on the nation’s biggest homemortgage underwriter FannieMae to devise a way to grantmore
loans to “borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for
conventional loans”.8 Thus, loans flowed even to the subprime borrowers, who were hardly able to pay
these back. The newly devised ‘originate and distribute’ model through securitisation of mortgage
assets took away the necessity of exercising due diligencewhile lending to subprime borrowers.Unlike
in the traditional lending model where the safeguards used to be checks by banks themselves, in the
Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS)model, the safeguards were checks by independent agencies that
had a vested interest in endorsing more home loans in order to earn more fees.
6] “A Billion Here, A Trillion There: Calculating the Cost of Wall Street’s Rescue”, http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/
article.cfm?articleid=2084, October 29th 2008
US Financial Crisis: Is It theMoment for Bretton
Woods II?
The Post-BrettonWoods Informal System
Impact on the US Interest Rate and the Housing Boom
Unfolding of the Global Financial Crisis
7] “Global Credit Crunch - Towards a Crisis of Globalisation”, http://www.fifthinternational.org/index.php?id=259,1303,0,0,1,0,
Autumn 2007
8] Holmes Steven A., “Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending”, http://query.nytimes.com/gst/
fullpage.html?res=9C0DE7DB153EF933A0575AC0A96F958260&sec=&spon=&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink